Latinos for Trump co-founder Bianca Gracia took center stage at a Friday White House press briefing, catching White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt by surprise as she called for a “siesta fiesta” on the South Lawn.

At the press briefing, Leavitt had to make clear she did not know Gracia beforehand following the activist’s fiery question (she called on her as the person “yelling in the back.”) Gracia also serves as a contributor to Newsmax.

Gracia accused Democrats of “choosing illegals over hard-working Hispanic Americans” while asking whether President Donald Trump would approve of a Hispanic Heritage Month event taking place at the White House following the administration cancelling the event.

An event to commemorate Hispanic Heritage Month was recently postponed due to the ongoing partial government shutdown.

Gracia asked Leavitt:

This week the Democrats have chosen illegals over hardworking Hispanic Americans during Hispanic Heritage Month, causing the White House to cancel the celebration with the president. Is the president open to letting the Hispanics, who overwhelmingly voted for him, have their own siesta fiesta on the White House lawn, opposed to the fancy, you know — we don’t need fancy-shmancy, you can give us the backyard and we’ll fill it all in and have our own fiesta. Is the president open to that?

“I had no idea she was going to ask that question,” a surprised Leavitt said as the room erupted in laughter. “I just want to preface that. I’ve never met you. I just want to say that. I love your energy.”

Leavitt noted the current construction taking place at the White House and said the event would be back in the “planning stages” once the government reopens.

“I can’t personally unilaterally promise the South Lawn grounds,” she said. “We have some construction going on out there, but I do think, I know that everyone here views it as very unfortunate we had to cancel or hopefully just reschedule the Hispanic American Heritage Month event, and it’s because we are working around the clock during this government shutdown. So when the Democrats vote to reopen the government that event will be back in the planning stages.”

Watch above via Fox News.

The post Latinos for Trump Founder Steals the Spotlight at Press Briefing by Calling for ‘Siesta Fiesta’ in Wild Moment first appeared on Mediaite.

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

Did you know you can customize Google to filter out garbage? Take these steps for better search results, including adding my work at Lifehacker as a preferred source.

I've tested a lot of smart glasses for Lifehacker, and it's tricky to compare them because the category is all over the place. Some "smart glasses," like Chamelo’s Music Shield, are stylish accessories with built-in speakers; others, like the XReal One Pro, are cutting-edge display glasses packed with tech. So lining them up side by side is like kiwis-to-tangelos.

But there is one thing that almost every pair of smart glasses shares: they play sounds. So I decided to focus on just that—how these glasses actually sound—using every pair I own, from $650 XReal One Pros to $25, get-em-at-Walmart WearIQ glasses. And it was weirdly difficult.

The challenge of comparing audio in smart glasses

There are two big hurdles to judging audio quality in smart glasses:

• Subjectivity. There’s no universal scale for “good sound.” Even if I measured the frequency response or output or something, that wouldn’t tell the whole story—mixing, balance, and how our ears interpret sound all matter too. So it's all subjective.

• Open-ear limitations. All open-ear audio is terrible for music compared to just about any other way of listening to it. The gap between the speaker and your ear means the bass gets lost, and the speakers are necessarily tiny, so everything trends toward the tinny side. Until someone manages to squeeze a subwoofer into a pair of sunglasses, even a $40 pair of earbuds will beat the most expensive smart glasses for playing back music.

How I tested

To keep things consistent, I listened to the same track for every pair: Billie Eilish’s "Bad Guy." It’s bass-heavy, with lots of spatial production elements, which makes it a solid stress test for both low-end response and clarity; the finger-snaps are a good test of high frequencies, and Eilish's voice is a nice test for the mids.

I'll start with the strongest glasses first and work my way down to the worst of the bunch.

XReal One Pro

XReal One Pro AR Glasses

$798.00 at Amazon

$968.00 Save $170.00

Get Deal

Get Deal

$798.00 at Amazon

$968.00 Save $170.00

XReal's AR-ready display glasses are at the top of the list for audio quality. XReal One Pros are a high-end piece of kit, with audio to match. The highs and mids are subtle, they handle the spatial effects well, and the bass almost sounds like bass. These glasses' sound system, developed by Bose, is as good as I’ve heard from a pair of smart glasses. 

Ray-Ban Metas

Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses

$263.00 at Best Buy

Get Deal

Get Deal

$263.00 at Best Buy

Ray-Ban Metas are my daily drivers, so maybe I'm a little biased, but the mids sounds "warmer" than in competing glasses, and the highs sound clear. Bass isn’t amazing, but it’s serviceable. They're comfortable for everyday listening.

Chamelo Music Shield

Chamelo Music Shield Sunglasses

$259.99 at Amazon

Get Deal

Get Deal

$259.99 at Amazon

Chamelo Music Shields have “music” right in the name, so you’d expect good things, and they mostly deliver. They come closer than anything else here to sounding "bass-y," (but it's really far from shaking your guts), but the top end is a little tinny. It's a subtle difference from the Meta glasses above and the BleeqUps below, but it's there. For me, anyway.

BleeqUp Cycling Glasses

BleeqUp AI Sports Camera Glasses

$449.00 at BleeqUp

Get Deal

Get Deal

$449.00 at BleeqUp

These audio/video sports glasses have a nice sound system, including an "extra loud" mode to account for windy conditions when you're out on a bike ride or trail run. They sound nice, warm, and balanced at medium volume, but cranking them up adds harshness and sharpness, particularly on the higher end.

Reebok Audio Smart Glasses

Reebok Nitrous Smart Audio Sunglasses

$199.00 at Amazon

Get Deal

Get Deal

$199.00 at Amazon

The difference in audio quality between almost all of these smart glasses is subtle, even more so among the entries in the middle of the pack. Having switched between various smart glasses more times than I care to admit, I prefer the audio of Chamelo Music Shield, the closest competitor to Reebok's audio glasses, but the music controls on Reebok's smart glasses are preferable, so it's really close.

Rokid Max 2

Rokid Max 2 AR Glasses

$429.00 at Amazon

Get Deal

Get Deal

$429.00 at Amazon

The audio from Rokid Max 2 glasses isn't bad, but the bass is weaker than the similar display glasses from XReal, and the overall clarity feels slightly mushy. Some listeners might put these higher on the list, but for me they lag just behind the top tier.

WeariQ Wireless Smart Glasses

WeariQ Smart Audio Glasses

$24.88 at Walmart

$29.88 Save $5.00

Get Deal

Get Deal

$24.88 at Walmart

$29.88 Save $5.00

You can buy these WeariQ "smart glasses" for about $25, so they're almost 10 times cheaper than any other glasses listed here. They work, too: the Bluetooth connects with no problem and sounds come out of the speakers. They don't sound great—the audio is tinny and distorts at high volume—but they exceeded my (very low) expectations and didn't even come in last place.

Solos AI Powered Glasses

SOLOS AI Powered Glasses

$249.00 at Amazon

Get Deal

Get Deal

$249.00 at Amazon

Even the $25 WearIQ glasses sound better than these: in a blind test with two other people, we all chose WearIQ over Solos. The Solos are all hissy top-end with no balance—fine for voice, maybe, but music is unlistenable. To be fair, these are last year's model of glasses, so perhaps newer models have improved the audio.

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

You can get Microsoft Windows 11 Pro on sale for just $10 right now on StackSocial, which would typically cost $200 at the Microsoft Store. The sale ends October 12. Once you've purchased, the redemption code and setup instructions will be sent to your inbox. Just make sure your system meets the minimum requirements (like a 1GHz processor, 4GB RAM, TPM 2.0, and UEFI firmware, among others). This isn’t an upgrade path for unsupported PCs—it’s a fresh install for machines that meet the full list of Windows 11 Pro requirements.

The Windows 11 Pro layout is cleaner, Snap Layouts and virtual desktops make multitasking smoother, and redocking windows actually works like you'd expect. If you’re into voice typing or just want better search across apps and docs, it delivers. Windows 11 Pro also includes some solid professional tools, such as BitLocker for encryption, Hyper-V for virtualization, and even a sandbox mode for testing apps safely. You’re also getting DirectX 12 Ultimate, so your hardware can shine during gaming or graphics-intensive tasks, assuming your machine is sufficiently powerful.

Windows 11 Pro also doubles down with biometric login, Smart App Control, and TPM 2.0 requirements, which makes it a tougher nut to crack. It also includes the new AI-powered Copilot and baked-in Microsoft Teams support, which might appeal to remote workers. Just a heads up, you won’t get an Office upgrade bundled in with this deal—this is strictly a Windows license. It will work alongside Office if you have a separate license, though (if you’re on a Mac using Parallels Pro). Overall, this $10 deal is about as straightforward and affordable as it gets.

President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office of the White House before signing an executive order regarding childhood cancer and the use of AI, Tuesday, Sept. 30, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

President Donald Trump notified Congress this week that the U.S. is now engaged in an official “armed conflict” with drug cartels, according to a confidential notice obtained by the New York Times.

The Times reported on Thursday that the “notice was sent to several congressional committees” and “adds new detail to the administration’s thinly articulated legal rationale for why three U.S. military strikes the president ordered on boats in the Caribbean Sea last month, killing all 17 people aboard them, should be seen as lawful rather than murder.”

The Associated Press also obtained the Trump administration’s notification to Congress, which the outlet reported “declared drug cartels operating in the Caribbean are unlawful combatants” and said the U.S. is now in a “non-international armed conflict.”

The Times reporters who broke the story, Charlie Savage and Eric Schmitt, discussed the impact of the notification in their report:

Mr. Trump’s move to formally deem his campaign against drug cartels as an active armed conflict means he is cementing his claim to extraordinary wartime powers, legal specialists said. In an armed conflict, as defined by international law, a country can lawfully kill enemy fighters even when they pose no threat, detain them indefinitely without trials and prosecute them in military courts.

The Times quoted Geoffrey S. Corn, a retired judge advocate general lawyer for the Army, saying that Trump’s declaration blurs the emergency war powers available to him, given that drug cartel members are not engaged in outright “hostilities” against the U.S. The Times added of Corn’s comments:

Noting that it is illegal for the military to deliberately target civilians who are not directly participating in hostilities — even suspected criminals — Mr. Corn called the president’s move an “abuse” that crossed a major legal line.

“This is not stretching the envelope,” he said. “This is shredding it. This is tearing it apart.”

This is a developing story and has been updated.

The post BREAKING: Trump Tells Congress the U.S. is Engaged In ‘Armed Conflict’ With Drug Cartels, Times Reports first appeared on Mediaite.

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

Did you know you can customize Google to filter out garbage? Take these steps for better search results, including adding Lifehacker as a preferred source for tech news.

With early Prime Day deals going live, now is the perfect time to start shopping for new tech essentials like TVs, headphones, and speakers. If you’re a gamer or a movie and TV fanatic in the market for a new screen, the 2025 Hisense U65QF 55-inch QLED TV is currently 42% off on Amazon, bringing it down to less than $500.

2025 Hisense U65QF 55-inch QLED TV

$467.99 at Amazon

$799.99 Save $332.00

Get Deal

Get Deal

$467.99 at Amazon

$799.99 Save $332.00

According to this PCMag review, the Hisense U65QF QLED stands out for its bright, well-balanced, and colorful picture quality. It has 4K resolution, a 16:9 aspect ratio, and 1,024 nits of brightness, making it one of the most affordable TVs to surpass 1,000 nits. Its mini-LED backlight adapts to different lighting conditions and helps the screen achieve dark blacks, as the review mentions, but there may still be some light bloom around high-contrast edges. Dolby Vision performance and color accuracy are impressive for a budget TV at this price point (as is off-angle viewing), though some greens may appear slightly oversaturated.

Gamers will appreciate the native 144Hz refresh rate, HDMI 2.1, and AMD FreeSync Premium Pro. The PCMag tester notes responsive performance, with Game Mode input lag coming in at 13.1 milliseconds with a 4K60 signal and 4.6 milliseconds with a 1080p120 signal. Dolby Atmos support and a built-in subwoofer add to the immersive experience. While there’s no hands-free voice control on this model, it does have built-in Alexa and Amazon Fire TV, with access to all major streaming services.

Ultimately, if you’re in the market for a mini-LED smart TV with exceptional value for gaming or viewing shows, sports, and TV shows, the Hisense U65QF 55-inch QLED TV provides stunning 4K visuals, QLED color accuracy, a smooth refresh rate, and other attributes that make it an excellent mid-range pick for anyone who wants premium-tier features without spending over $500.

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

Did you know you can customize Google to filter out garbage? Take these steps for better search results, including adding Lifehacker as a preferred source for tech news.

I've written a lot of e-bike reviews for Lifehacker, and almost all of the bikes have come from established companies like Canyon, Aventon, and Specialized. Though they came from big brands, you generally can't buy these bikes from large retailers like Amazon or Best Buy; you gotta buy 'em direct or through a bike shop. That means you have to put in a little more legwork to get one, but it's worth it. I always recommend test riding as many bikes as you can, and since those big box retailers tend to sell lower-priced e-bikes, the quality can vary wildly.

To demonstrate this (and provide a general guide of red flags to look for in an e-bike), I'm comparing a fat-tire e-bike you can get at Walmart, The Magicyle Ocelot Pro, against a comparable, straight-to-consumer ride, The Aventon Aventure 3. At first glance, they seems similar—both are fat-tire trail bikes designed to be ridden on both local bike paths and a gravel roads—but there's a world of difference between them.

The price of an e-bike

E-bikes are not cheap. For a reliable-but-not-flashy ride, you'll probably spend at least $1,500. You can buy e-bikes on Amazon for ridiculously low prices, like this e-mountain bike for $355, but I wouldn't ride this particular bike anywhere, let alone down a mountain. I'm a big fan of semi-disposable consumer goods in most cases, but not when it comes to safety; a powered vehicle that can reach speeds of nearly 30mph is not where you want to skimp.

The Magicycle Ocelot Pro isn't one of these dirt-cheap bikes. They seem like they're somewhere between a no-name-special and a bike from a more established company. Unlike most bicycle companies, you can get Magicycles through larger retailers. The company lists the Ocelot Pro at $2,399 with a markdown to $1,499, but Walmart says the list price is $1,699. An Aventon Aventure 3 costs $1999, and can only be purchased through the company and partnered bike shops.

Many people might think that because the Magicycle is cheaper and easier to purchase, the choice is obvious—but that $500 or so is the difference between one of the best e-bikes I've tested and one of the worst.

Profit margins and cut corners

Magicycle Ocelot Pro Electric Bike

$1,699.99 at Walmart

Get Deal

Get Deal

$1,699.99 at Walmart

Manufacturers who sell through retail chains have a much larger base of potential buyers, but the downside is, generally, whippet-skinny profit margins. While I obviously don't know what Magicycle's profit-margins are like, my first impression of the Ocelot Pro was "corners were cut."

Before I even gave it a test drive, I spun the front wheel. It's not aligned properly, which I noticed immediately:

Getting a wheel sorted costs about $20 at your local bike shop, but many bike shops flat-out won't work on bicycles with parts that aren't from established companies. The Ocelot Pro is a mishmash of lower end components from brands like Shimano and parts with no manufacturer listed, so you could run into problems with repairs down the road.

Speaking of non-name-brand parts, both WalMart's site and Magicycle's picture an Ocelot Pro with 20X4" tires from Kenda, a reputable tire company, but the tires on the actual bike have no name. Look:

Credit: Stephen Johnson

These anonymous tires might be fine, but how could you know? As promised, Aventon's bike has 26x4" Inova tires.

Speaking of parts, the Aventure's suspension fork was made by Zoom. While not a top-of-the-line component, Zoom forks are a solid, lower-end component. Like its tires, the Ocelot's fork was made by no one, so who knows how it will perform? For casual riding, it would likely never make a difference, but these are both ostensibly all-terrain bikes that you can ride on gravel, which suggests a level of ruggedness that I wouldn't feel comfortable trusting to a mystery suspension fork.

Speed test

Both the Aventure 3 and the the Ocelot Pro are legally classified as "class 3" e-bikes. That means the motor assistance should stop at 28 mph from pedaling, and the throttle-only assistance is supposed to top out at 20 mph. But on my first ride on the Ocelot, I twisted the throttle and the thing accelerated to nearly 23 mph. For comparison, the Aventure 3 tops out at 20 mph. Check it out:

That makes the Ocelot Pro the fastest throttled e-bike I've ever tested for Lifehacker. "It goes faster" might be a selling point for some, but it makes this bike technically illegal to ride on the streets of California. Cops aren't likely to be radar-checking to make sure your e-bike never breaks 20 mph, but going over the limit by anything suggests a lack of quality control, a corner that has been cut. Another point of comparison in the video above: while both bikes output around the same amount of power, the Ocelot Pro's motor is a lot louder than the Aventon's.

And then there's the battery gauge. For technical reasons involving voltage and amperages, the "fuel gauges" on e-bikes are never that accurate, but the Ocelot's is among the worst I've experienced. It's all over the place: when I left to take the above video, the gauge read 67%. It was 32% half a mile later, then down to 22% after a mile ride. I turned the thing on and off, and it was at 56%:

Credit: Stephen Johnson

Everything else

Beyond parts and performance, there are the intangibles that separate a budget e-bike from a premium one, and they matter, particularly when you're playing between $1,500 and $2,000 for a product.

Overall, the Aventure 3 looks and rides like a premium e-bike: the welds are clean and the paint is sharp. The Ocelot Pro feels thrown together. It's not something you can measure on a spec sheet, but I've tested many e-bikes for Lifehacker, and I can feel the difference between a janky bike and a solid one. The Aventon feels like a bike you could trust on a long ride; the Ocelot feels like a bike you’d be nervous to take too far from home.

The Aventure 3 comes with an app that connects to the bike via Bluetooth, letting you track rides, tweak settings (including getting granular with the pedal assist levels), and update firmware. It also features a suite of built-in anti-theft features—like disabling the motor if the bike is stolen and GPS tracking—for extra peace of mind. There's even a mini social media feature to check out what other Aventon riders are up to. The Magicycle has none of that. You’re buying a single product, not something that feels supported or maintained over time.

Be careful where you buy your bike

Credit: Stephen Johnson

On paper, the Aventon Aventure 3 and the Magicycle Ocelot Pro look like they’re playing in the same league, but they just ain't. The Aventure delivers reliable performance, thoughtful features, and long-term support, while the Ocelot cuts corners in ways you might not notice, especially if you haven't ridden a ton of e-bikes. If you’re spending $1,500 or more on a bike, it’s worth spending a little extra for a brand with a reputation for producing worthwhile products. So my advice remains the same: test ride as many bikes as you can, and before you buy an e-bike from Target (or Walmart, or Amazon), make very sure you know what you're getting yourself into.

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

Did you know you can customize Google to filter out garbage? Take these steps for better search results, including adding Lifehacker as a preferred source for tech news.

Can you remember the last time you had a totally pain-free back? I know I’m on a never-ending search for relief. Percussive massage guns, non-percussive massage guns, regular foam rollers, even percussive foam rollers—I’m determined to try it all. Now, my search has brought me to decompression devices.

These devices promise personalized, premium massages and decompression right in your own home. It's the closest thing you can get to replicating an actual masseuse. You lay on your back and let the rollers in the device do the work for you. And from personal experience, I can share that they do provide immediate comfort and relief.

The thing is, compared to a standard massage gun, a full decompression massage table is pretty expensive. Products like the Chirp Contour might feel amazing, but with a price tag of $600, I have to wonder if they’re truly worth every penny. Do these devices deliver real results or just Instagram-worthy self-care moments?

The massage professionals I spoke with shared a consistent perspective: These devices aren't worthless, but they're far from essential for most people. Here’s what you need to know before you drop hundreds of dollars in your righteous pursuit of muscle relief. 

Chirp Contour Decompression & Massage Table

$599.99 at Best Buy

Shop Now

Shop Now

$599.99 at Best Buy

What these devices actually do

To be clear, these tables do provide real sensations of relief. "Of course this device is going to feel good. It's going to provide massage and heat, which is going to help to relax the muscle tension," explains W. Zach Smith, founder and doctor of physical therapy at HIDEF Physical Therapy. Plus, "devices like this are getting better and better, and if you have the disposable income, it can be of some benefit to you." I know I adore my Chirp Contour, which specifically offers considerable customization. But Smith quickly adds an important caveat: "For most people, what I see with these types of devices is they purchase some, use them for a few weeks and then they end up just sitting at their home not getting used." 

That pattern—initial enthusiasm followed by the device becoming expensive furniture—is perhaps the most damning criticism. Smith notes he personally hasn't "found one of these devices that is just an absolute game changer" for his patients that leads to consistent long-term use.

Amanda Grimm, a sports and remedial massage therapist at Knead Massage, points out another often-overlooked benefit: "At-home massage/decompression tables can help with relaxation, if nothing else, for the fact that they make the person stop rushing around and take some time for themselves." That forced pause can help relieve tension, though it "may not be the targeted muscle relief that the individual requires."

Addressing the root cause of back pain

Here's where things get sobering for anyone hoping a $600 purchase will solve their chronic pain. Smith is blunt: "At the end of the day, massage and heat is not going to resolve 90% of low back pain. You need the additional mobility, stretching, and the most important, a re-strengthening program in order to truly solve low back pain."

Jennifer Brandon, rehabilitation manager at HOAG Orthopedic Institute, echoes this concern: "I think that at home decompression tables can be helpful in finding some relief, even to loosen your tight muscles. I would just note that at home gadgets should never replace structured rehabilitation, nor should they really be substituted for strength training to build up weak muscles."

From a sports recovery perspective, Grimm notes these devices "may aid general self-care, but without the assessment, additional full movement and personalized treatment provided by a professional therapist, they are more superficial than impactful."

Running the numbers

Still, I get a lot of relief with my Chirp Contour, so let's do the math to see when these devices are worth their cost. If you typically pay $100 for an hour-long professional massage, a $600 device would theoretically pay for itself after just six uses. Sounds great, right?

But here's the reality check: These aren't equivalent experiences. A professional massage involves assessment, targeted technique, adjustment based on your body's response, and often addresses issues you didn't even know you had. Your at-home device delivers the same experience every time—no expert eyes evaluating your problem, no hands adapting pressure to what your muscles need.

If you were getting weekly massages at $100 each, you'd spend $5,200 annually. In that scenario, a $600 device seems like a no-brainer investment. But most people aren't getting weekly professional massages. They're considering whether to buy this device instead of occasional professional treatment—and that's where the comparison falls apart.

Brandon sums it up well: "These items can be more of a wellness nice-to-have, than a must-have. Especially with such a steep price range. If you find yourself dealing with an ongoing issue, you might be better off investing that money into a professional that can help you get to the actual root of your problem."

Grimm offers a practical middle ground: "For $600, it may be more beneficial to invest that in a series of remedial sports massages for injury relief—but that said, if you have the disposable cash to spend, then it can work as a cool-down tool after a workout or just a bit of pampering!"

The bottom line 

Expensive decompression and massage tables aren't scams—they do provide relaxation and temporary relief. But they're not the miracle solution their marketing suggests. I would tell you if I thought something was worth every penny, but $600 is a whole lot of pennies. If you're dealing with chronic pain or sports injuries, that $600 is almost certainly better spent on professional assessment and treatment that addresses the underlying problem.

However, if you already have a solid strength and mobility routine, see professionals when needed, and simply want a luxurious recovery tool for your home gym? And crucially, if you're the type of person who'll actually use it consistently rather than letting it collect dust? Then it might be worth considering. Just go in with realistic expectations about what it can and cannot do.

Think of it like buying a fancy espresso machine. It's not going to replace your favorite coffee shop's expertise, but it's a nice convenience if you'll genuinely use it regularly and can comfortably afford it. The key question isn't whether it works; it's whether you'll still be using it six months from now.