President Donald Trump proclaimed from the Oval Office on Tuesday that Iran “knows what not to do” as the ceasefire brokered with the Islamic Republic appears to show signs of crumbling.

It all started when Daily Caller White House correspondent Reagan Reese asked Trump during an event with young athletes what Iran has to do “to violate the ceasefire.”

“Well, you’ll find out,” Trump replied to Reese. “I will let you know. They know what to do. They know what not to do, more importantly, actually.”

Trump added:

They fired them from little boats with pea shooters. You know the peashooters? A little boat. You know why? Because they don’t have any boats anymore. Their Navy is comprised of- they call them little boats. And they’re fast. They’re so fast. They had eight of them, and they’re all gone. They’re fast, but they’re not fast like a missile. A missile is slightly faster. They’re all gone. So they’re looking around for little boats to try and compete with our great Navy. We have a Navy that’s unbelievable. You know, when you set up a blockade, as you know very well. Not one ship. A couple tried and they got their engines shot out. You remember, I think it was one of them. It was a great display.

Trump’s words came as cracks have begun to form in the ceasefire agreed to last month.

CNN national security correspondent Natasha Bertrand reported on Monday that U.S. Central Command Chief, Admiral Bradley Cooper, acknowledged that U.S. military and commercial vessels were attacked by Iran in the Strait of Hormuz earlier in the day.

That same day, Trump told Fox News reporter Trey Yingst that if the Iranians try to target U.S. ships in this area, they will be “blown off the face of the earth.”

Earlier Tuesday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who was also present in the Oval Office on Tuesday, denied that the exchange of fire with Iran on Monday had broken the ongoing ceasefire, framing the clash as a “separate and distinct project” when a reporter grilled him on the subject at the Pentagon.

Watch above via Fox News.

The post Trump Declares Iran ‘Knows What Not to Do’ as Ceasefire Teeters first appeared on Mediaite.

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

Last weekend I strapped two different Garmin running watches to my wrists and raced a 10K. On one arm, I wore the Forerunner 970, Garmin's top-of-the-line, $750 running watch. On the other, I wore the Forerunner 165 Music, which is far more budget-friendly at $300. I wanted to see if having a fancy running watch really makes a difference during a race. The answer is complicated.

Consider this: The weekend before my race, the winners of the London Marathon competed wearing the Forerunner 55 and the Forerunner 255—two watches that are, by tech standards, practically ancient. This fact was certainly in the back of mind as I raced (at a fraction of those runners’ pace, and for a much shorter distance): Two of the most elite runners in the world right now wear solid, no-frills Garmins. Why would I need something better? What difference can a wearable really make during a competitive run?

Garmin® Forerunner® 970, Premium GPS Running and Triathlon Smartwatch, AMOLED Display, Built-in LED Flashlight, Titanium with Whitestone Case and Whitestone/Translucent Amp Yellow Band

$649.99 at Amazon

$749.99 Save $100.00

Shop Now

Shop Now

$649.99 at Amazon

$749.99 Save $100.00

Both Garmins have accurate heart rate and GPS

Before race day, I did a controlled interval run wearing both watches and a chest strap to test for heart rate accuracy. Compared side by side, both watches performed well: They captured the highs and the lows without clipping at either end of the range (which is more than you can say for a lot of wrist-based optical sensors). The 970, with its more advanced sensor, tracked cleanly throughout, though the 165 was solid too, even if it occasionally lagged a beat behind, reading slightly low in the moments following a hard interval effort. The difference wasn't dramatic, but it was noticeable when I looked for it. For a serious racer obsessing over every BPM, that matters. For the rest of us, either watch would be more than adequate.

The black line is the chest strap; purple is the 165; orange is the 970. Credit: Meredith Dietz

As far as GPS goes, both watches locked onto a signal quickly and held it throughout the run. For a standard 10K in an open environment, you'd be hard-pressed to feel the difference. Again, the 970 edges ahead in precision, which is particularly useful if you're running tight track intervals or navigating complex urban routes. But for most runners logging miles in the real world, the 165 will still give you a GPS record you can trust.

Garmin Forerunner 165 Music Running Smartwatch

$245.00 at Amazon

$299.99 Save $54.99

Shop Now

Shop Now

$245.00 at Amazon

$299.99 Save $54.99

Only the Forerunner 970 has my favorite Garmin watch features

The 970 has an undeniable edge when it comes to advanced features. The major selling point of this watch is that it offers a deeper dive into performance data: more advanced running dynamics, detailed training load analysis, and race-specific features. One standout example is Auto Lap by Timing Gates: During an official race, the 970 can automatically detect chip timing mats and split your laps accordingly, which is a true game-changer for runners like me who endlessly sweat over every little detail on race day.

The 165 keeps it simpler. You get your reliable core metrics—pace, distance, heart rate, cadence—but that's about it. For a runner who wants the essentials without drowning in data, I’d argue this sort of simplicity is a perk, not a limitation. 

The 970 really does have a more premium vibe to it. Credit: Meredith Dietz

Is it worth it to upgrade your running watch?

Running with both of these watches simultaneously gave me a greater appreciation for the ease of using a touchscreen like the one on the Forerunner 970. Swiping through data screens mid-run, navigating menus with a tap instead of fumbling for buttons—it does deliver a certain “elite” feeling. It's responsive, intuitive, and polished in a way that a button interface simply isn't.

But here’s the thing: Feeling elite doesn’t actually make you a better runner. A fancier watch is no doubt a quality-of-life upgrade, but I can’t honestly say that it made me run a different race. Whether a quality-of-life upgrade is worth $400 is ultimately up to you.

As my colleague Beth Skwarecki put it, everything outside of your time and your pace is icing on the cake. If you're a competitive athlete who races frequently, obsesses over training data, and values having the most accurate sensor on your wrist, the 970 delivers. If you're training for your first race, chasing a personal best, or just want a reliable watch to track your morning runs, the 165 Music will serve you well at a fraction of the cost. And if you're comparing it to true budget options, the 165 is still far from "basic."

Remember, those London Marathon winners crossed the finish line ahead of everyone else while wearing the most barebones of running watches. Elite performance doesn't live in the hardware, but in your body. But hey, if the 970's touchscreen gets you excited to lace up every morning, then it's worth the premium price.

(AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)

Former New York City mayor and Donald Trump confidante Rudy Giuliani is recovering from pneumonia and is breathing on his own, according to his spokesman, Ted Goodman.

Goodman announced Sunday that Giuliani was hospitalized in critical condition, but did not provide additional details then.

In an update posted to X on Monday, Goodman wrote that the 81-year-old remained critical but no longer required a ventilator to breathe.

Giuliani “is now breathing on his own, with his family and primary medical provider at his side,” Goodman wrote, adding, “Mayor Giuliani is the ultimate fighter — as he has demonstrated throughout his life — and he is winning this battle.”

Giuliani has a condition called “restrictive airway disease,” Goodman wrote, contracted during the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on New York City. He wrote that the condition exacerbates respiratory illnesses like pneumonia.

On Friday night, Giuliani hosted his podcast “America’s Mayor Live” and noted he had a cough and that his voice was “a little bit under the weather.” He was hospitalized soon after.

Goodman wrote that the virus “quickly overwhelmed his body, requiring mechanical ventilation to maintain adequate oxygen and stabilize his condition.”

Trump confirmed Sunday that Giuliani was hospitalized.

“Our fabulous Rudy Giuliani, a True Warrior, and the Best Mayor in the History of New York City, BY FAR, has been hospitalized, and is in critical condition,” Trump wrote.

“What a tragedy that he was treated so badly by the Radical Left Lunatics, Democrats ALL — AND HE WAS RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING!” Trump added. “They cheated on the Elections, fabricated hundreds of stories, did anything possible to destroy our Nation, and now, look at Rudy. So sad!”

Giuliani served as Trump’s personal lawyer, and became a zealous proponent of Trump’s theory that the 2020 elections were rigged against him. Giuliani was disbarred in New York and Washington, D.C. over his actions to overturn the election.

Giuliani was hospitalized last year after suffering serious injuries sustained in a car crash in New Hampshire. Trump said days after that accident that he would award Giuliani the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

The post Rudy Giuliani Now ‘Breathing on His Own’ But Remains in Critical Condition With Pneumonia first appeared on Mediaite.

If your console of choice is PlayStation and you tend to buy your video games digitally, I have good news and bad news. The good news is you might be entitled to some money thanks to a proposed lawsuit settlement from Sony. The bad news is, it's probably not going to amount to all that much.

In a press release on Wednesday, the Saveri Law Firm announced a class action settlement for a case filed against Sony. The case, which is currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, centers on Sony's PlayStation Store: The plaintiffs in the case claim that Sony acted as a monopoly in the sale of its digital games, which drove prices for gamers higher than they should have been on the PlayStation Store. At the core of the argument is Sony's game voucher program, which, prior to 2019, allowed gamers to buy digital game copies from retail stores. The case argues that stores could sell games cheaper than Sony's digital store, but once the company stopped supporting game vouchers, gamers only had the option to pay the higher online prices. Sony, for its part, has denied any wrongdoing in this case, and the court has not found Sony guilty of the allegations.

While Sony is not admitting guilt, it does seem ready to settle. As such, the court has "preliminarily approved" the $7,850,000 settlement. If this settlement is approved during a subsequent hearing, that's the amount Sony will pay to settle the suit for all impacted customers. If you've ever bought a digital game on the PlayStation Store, you could be eligible for a (small) slice of those millions.

How can I check if I'm eligible for the PlayStation Store settlement?

There are a few qualifications that may exclude some customers, but if you're a Sony gamer, I'd bet there's a good chance you'd qualify. According to the suit, anyone who bought at least one digtal game through the PlayStation Store between April 1, 2019 and Dec. 31, 2023 may be entitled. That game needed to have previously had a voucher available in stores, and that voucher must have sold at least 200 copies before April 2019. Finally, the game's price needs to have increased by at least $0.50 after April 2019 compared to the price while the voucher was available. You can see the full list of applicable games here.

If that's confusing, here's the saving grace: If you do qualify, you don't actually need to do anything. The suit says that if you don't act to exclude yourself before July 2, 2026, you will be considered part of the Settlement Class. You can exclude yourself from the settlement if you want, but you must do so before July 2. You'll lose out on the payment, but you'll retain your right to sue Sony if you choose. You can also formally object to the settlement, which grants you the right to speak in person at the Fariness Hearing.

How much you'll get from the PlayStation Store settlement

We don't know exactly how many people will make up the settlement class, so it's tough to say precisely what the payments will be. But since there are likely many gamers who bought the digital games in the list during those select dates, the pool is probably quite large—especially considering you don't have to do anything (or even know about the lawsuit) to get a payout.

Push Square's Sammy Barker has an estimate based on all available data thus far, and it's not too impressive: You're likely to get around $1 to $3 per purchase. If you bought a ton of digital games on your PS4 or PS5, you might be wind up with a decent payout, but if you only bought a handful, don't expect your cut to amount to much.

Screenshot/Associated Press

Secretary of State Marco Rubio retained his title as “Secretary of Everything” Saturday night when he took a spin in the DJ booth at a family wedding.

Rubio got the nickname for his multiple high-profile jobs within the Trump administration, including interim national security advisor, and head archivist of the National Archives, among other roles.

White House deputy chief of staff Dan Scavino posted the wedding video to X, writing, “Our Great Secretary of State @MarcoRubio DJ’s weddings too! Here he is in action tonight at a family wedding…Let’s goooooo!!!”

Rubio sported headphones and seemed to confer with the hired DJ when playing “Shiver” by John Summit & HAYLA, much to the guests’ delight as they linked arms and chanted to the beat.

At one point, Rubio nodded his head and waved his arm to the chorus, which really got the crowd going.

Rubio was apparently taking some down time before heading to Rome to meet with Pope Leo XIV this week in an attempt to thaw relations with the Vatican. The pontiff and Donald Trump have been exchanging words via social media over Trump’s policies on the Iran war, immigration, and memes depicting the president as Jesus Christ.

Trump has said, “I’m not a fan of Pope Leo,” while the Holy Father responded that he has “no fear” of the Trump administration.

The visit will be Rubio’s third trip to Italy in 12 months. He’s also expected to meet with Pietro Parolin, the Vatican’s top diplomat, as well as with Antonio Tajani, Italy’s deputy prime minister and foreign minister.

Rubio reportedly also asked to meet with Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, but the request hasn’t yet been granted. Trump was critical of Meloni for standing behind Pope Leo during their war of words, and Rubio has denounced NATO allies for staying out of the Iran fracas.

The Pope turned his words into action on Friday, when he appointed former undocumented migrant Evelio Menjivar-Ayala as bishop of West Virginia in the United States. Menjivar-Ayala is originally from El Salvador and arrived in the US in 1990 hidden in the trunk of a car. He was ordained as a priest in 2004.

The post Watch: Marco Rubio Scores Yet Another Gig — Wedding DJ first appeared on Mediaite.

MS NOW legal analyst Paul Butler argued the U.S. Supreme Court clearly does not “respect” the rights of Black and Brown voters after ruling that race-based gerrymandering violates the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

Butler ripped the 6-3 ruling during an interview on MS NOW’s The Weekend: Primetime on Saturday night.

“In some ways, this is one of the worst Supreme Court decisions on race ever,” Butler said. “It’s actually worse than Plessy versus Ferguson. Plessy actually required formal equality, separate but equal. With this case, Black and Brown votes don’t have the same power as White votes.”

His comment stunned co-host Ayman Mohyeldin, who let out a “wow” as Butler made his case.

“It’s like the Dred Scott decision, where the court said that the Black man has no rights that the white man is bound to respect,” Butler continued. “The Supreme Court is saying that the Black voter and the Brown voter has no rights that it respects.”

And a minute later in the discussion, Butler was asked what the next step was for Democrats to counter the decision.

“So you ask, where do we go from here? A lot of Black people are just leaning on our history saying, we got through enslavement, we got through Jim Crow, somehow we’ll get through this.”

Butler shared his take a few days after the landmark 6-3 ruling voided Louisiana’s second majority Black congressional district, with the court’s conservative-leaning justices finding it relied too heavily on race.

Chief Justice John Roberts said the Louisiana district was a “snake” created along racial lines. Justice Samuel Alito agreed, writing the map was an “unconstitutional gerrymander.”

“Allowing race to play any part in government decisionmaking represents a departure from the constitutional rule that applies in almost every other context,” Alito wrote.

Alito added the goals of the 1965 Voting Rights Act had been distorted by those looking to shape districts along racial lines, hoping to gain more seats in Congress. Section II of the law he said was  “limited to instances of intentional discrimination,” which he said is a “very high standard” to prove.

Butler — who teaches law at Georgetown University — was not the only pundit on the panel who was upset about the ruling. Co-host Catherine Rampell sounded pretty dejected by it while sitting across from Butler, asking out loud if the “remedy” for Democrats would be “packing the court.”

And CNN star Abby Phillip on Saturday worried the ruling could“eradicate” political representation for Black Americans and other minority groups in the South.

President Donald Trump, on the other hand, celebrated the decision on Wednesday.

“That’s good!” a giddy Trump said when a reporter told him about it. “That’s the kind of ruling I like.”

Watch above via MS NOW.

The post MS NOW Legal Analyst Claims Black Voters Have ‘No Rights’ That the Supreme Court ‘Respects’ first appeared on Mediaite.

Screenshot

Conservative host Tucker Carlson denied calling President Donald Trump the “antichrist” when pressed by New York Times journalist Lulu Garcia-Navarro during a deep-dive sit-down for the paper’s show, The Interview.

Carlson has had a recent very public falling-out with the president over issues like the Iran war and memes depicting himself as Jesus Christ.

In one recent show, Carlson asked if Trump could be the antichrist, and on another show with accused rapist-turned-Christian Russell Brand, the two discussed Bible passages about the antichrist, with Carlson calling one passage, “Ripped from the headlines.”

“You’ve been talking on your show about whether Trump is the ‘antichrist,'” Garcia-Navarro said during the interview, to which Carlson replied, “I have not said that.”

“On your show, the day after Easter, you noted he did not put his hand on the Bible during his swearing-in ceremony as president —”

“Correct,” Carlson agreed.

Garcia-Navarro continued, “— and you said, and I’m quoting, ‘Maybe he didn’t put his hand on the Bible because he affirmatively rejects what’s inside that book.’ And then on a recent show, you went further, saying: ‘Here’s a leader who’s mocking the gods of his ancestors, mocking the God of gods and exalting himself above them. Could this be the antichrist?’”

“I actually did not say, ‘Could this be the Antichrist,'” Carlson maintained. “I don’t know where that comes from, but I know that those words never left my lips because I’m not sure I fully understand what the antichrist is, if there’s just one. I actually tried to understand it. I may have said some are asking that. I am not weighing in on that because I don’t understand it.”

“So to be clear, though, that was not what you were suggesting?” Garcia-Navarro asked.

“If I thought Trump was the antichrist, I would just say so. If I understood what the antichrist is, I’d say so, and I don’t really,” Carlson answered.

“You’ve been discussing it repeatedly on your show, so I’m just trying to understand why,” Garcia-Navarro continued. “What do you want your audience to be considering?”

“I just want to make the point repeatedly again and again that there are unseen forces that act, that there is a spiritual realm, and we are subject to those forces for good and bad, and I don’t think that any person can deny that,” Carlson said.

Garcia-Navarro pressed one more time, saying, “I just want to make the point that you did say, ‘Could this be the antichrist?’ And then you said, ‘Well, who knows? You did use those words.”

This time, Carlson backed down.

“Man, then my apologies to you if there’s a video of me saying that,” he said. “I guess what I’m expressing to you is it doesn’t reflect exactly how I feel. It suggests a precision that I haven’t arrived at, that Trump is the antichrist. You’d have to define antichrist, and I know that I can’t define it, and it’s not clearly defined in the New Testament or Old Testament.”

The post Tucker Carlson Denies Suggesting Trump Could Be the ‘Antichrist’ in NYT Interview — But The Reporter Brought Receipts first appeared on Mediaite.