Rep. Jason Crow (D-CO) — who felt Donald Trump’s wrath for recording a video message advising service members against following illegal orders — now says he’s “damn furious” that Trump is risking young Americans’ lives in war with Iran.

Trump released his own video announcement early Saturday morning, saying,”The administration has taken every possible step to minimize the risk to U.S. Personnel in the region even so — and I do not make this statement lightly — The Iranian regime seeks to kill the lives of courageous American heroes may be lost, and we may have casualties.”

Trump added, “That often happens in war, but we’re doing this not for now. We’re doing this for the future. And it is a noble mission.”

“Well listen, I’m just damn furious,” Crow told CNN’s Kaitlan Collins Saturday. “You know, the man’s a five-time draft dodger. He’s an elite. And, you know, I went to war. I fought with working-class kids. They’re the ones that do the fighting and dying.”

Crow continued:

And how amazing of Donald Trump to say, you know, “That often happens in war.” And that’s a cost he’s willing to take. Great for him! It’s not his kids. It’s not his family. It’s not his billionaire donors who are having to go off and do it. It’s kids in towns across the country that have to pick up the guns, jump into the planes and helicopters, and get it done. And it’s kids that are sitting there at military bases in Bahrain like your video’s showing now, who are sitting in bunkers right now because Donald Trump is willing to take a chance with their lives. This is everything that’s wrong with our national security infrastructure and our policies. Elites make decisions. They talk tough. They pound their chests, and then everybody else is left holding the bag. Enough is enough.

Collins asked if Crow wanted to see a congressional vote on the military action.

“Heck yeah, I do,” Crow answered. “I think we should go back to D.C. right now. I’m willing to jump on a plane in an hour and go home and take up a vote on this, because that is what the American people deserve. They deserve accountability. They deserve to know who is willing to take chances with their national security, their kids’ lives, their taxpayer dollars. Let’s take the vote. I want names.”

Watch above via CNN.

The post ‘I’m Just Damn Furious’: Military Vet Jason Crow Slams Trump For Risking American Kids’ Lives first appeared on Mediaite.

Just hours before the U.S.-Israel strike on Iran, President Donald Trump spoke with MS NOW’s Joe Scarborough — with the president telling the MS Now host Iran was a “menace” that “had to be taken out.”

Anchoring special coverage Saturday alongside Mika Brzezinski, Scarborough dished on his conversation with the president right before the attack.

“I spoke late yesterday afternoon — I believe it was the first time I’ve spoken with the president since I reported about it on Venezuela — and I had been keeping up talking to people that were part of the negotiations for some time,” Scarborough said. “And what’s interesting is they left those negotiations feeling like some progress had been made. They said the tale would be [told] over the next 3 to 4 days.”

But Scarborough went on to note that Trump, on Friday afternoon, had hardened in his stance.

“I spoke to the president late yesterday afternoon and he seemed far more determined that Iran had been a menace to the United States for over four decades,” Scarborough said. “They had been, as we say here, the epicenter of terrorism. And they had to be taken out.”

Watch above, via MS NOW.

The post Joe Scarborough Reveals He Spoke to Trump Hours Before Attack: He Said ‘Menace’ Iran ‘Had to Be Taken Out’ first appeared on Mediaite.

Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) claimed Friday that the video of Hillary Clinton’s deposition on Jeffrey Epstein will show the public how “unhinged” the former secretary of state became during her testimony.

Mace joined House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-KY) and other Republicans outside the Performing Arts Center in Chappaqua, NY, where Hillary Clinton testified Thursday and former President Bill Clinton is testifying today.

A reporter asked the group, “It’s our understanding that you guys asked Secretary Clinton yesterday about photos of her husband in the Epstein files. What was her reaction when you showed various photos for example of her husband in the jacuzzi that we’ve seen?”

“I’m going to let Miss Mace answer that,” Comer said while patting a grinning Mace on the shoulders and reminding her, “We’re on TV”

Mace laughed and said, “Okay, I got it, I’m not going to say anything.”

Mace continued:

Uh, no, she didn’t want to answer any questions about any of that, and deferred most of those most of those if not all of those to her husband, and he will be thoroughly asked about that today. You know, what did he know, what did he see? Because there are other people who have come forward like Kevin Spacey, who thought all of this was very strange and very high risk for a president of the United States, or former president. It was all very bizarre. But I asked her very pointed questions and you’ll see that in the transcript coming out, how she responded as well — screaming.

Comer said, “We will get the video out as quickly as we can get it uploaded with sound and everything from yesterday. So, this is — for all practical purposes —  this is a public deposition. The American people will see it. I have heard that C-SPAN is going to air it wire-to-wire. I think it will lead to a lot of questions with [Howard] Lutnick and other things like that.”

Regarding Bill Clinton’s testimony, Comer said, “Throughout the day we will try to send different members out. We don’t want to disclose what’s going on in the deposition specifically until after the conclusion, but we will keep you updated and appreciate everyone being here and look forward to updating you throughout the day.”

When Comer finished, a reporter asked, “Miss Mace, what do you mean that Hillary Clinton was screaming?”

Mace answered, “She was unhinged. I hope that President Clinton is less unhinged today than his wife was yesterday. You’ll see it.”

As Mace answered, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) smiled and nodded her head in agreement.

Watch the clip above via C-SPAN.

The post Nancy Mace Claims Video Will Show Hillary Clinton Was ‘Unhinged’ and ‘Screaming’ During Her Deposition first appeared on Mediaite.

Amazon's Wish List feature is a versatile way to tell other people what gifts you're interested in. That might be a gift registry for a baby shower, or letting your friends and family know what you want for your birthday. But it's also commonly used for online creators to receive gifts from fans or for someone in need to receive donated items from strangers online who want to help. Up until now, we could rely on Wish List as a secure way for strangers to send items, without worrying about setting up a post office box. But going forward, Wish List now runs the risk of telling fans exactly where the creator lives—unless the creator takes action.

Amazon is putting addresses at risk with changes to Wish List

As reported by 404 Media, Amazon is recommending customers that use Wish Lists to change their shipping addresses to either P.O. boxes or non-residential delivery addresses. The company is making changes to Wish Lists, which could reveal the address you have on file for the feature. By leaving it as your home address, you are putting yourself at risk of doxxing—or revealing your personal address to strangers on the internet.

That's because Amazon is now removing the option to block purchases from third-party sellers for Wish List items. As such, anyone who buys items off your Wish List to send to you will be able to buy them from third-party sellers, and those sellers will have access to your delivery address. From Amazon's point of view, these changes give buyers more flexibility over the items they can buy from your list, but that unfortunately comes with an impact on your personal privacy. But it's not just sellers who will have access to this address: Buyers will, too, as they may see your address in shipping updates they receive throughout the buying process.

As 404 Media highlights, major shippers don't usually reveal addresses in these situations. But Amazon's changes mean that third-party sellers have it in their power to share this information themselves. What's more, if the delivery person ends up taking photos of the package to confirm delivery, that could leak even more of your personal details than you'd want—such as what your front door or driveway look like.

These changes aren't effective immediately, so if you use Amazon's Wish Lists, you don't have to worry about your home address leaking on the internet just yet. However, the company has set a deadline for March 25, so it's important to act fast if you want to protect yourself.

Below, you can read the email Amazon is sending the following email to Wish List users:

“We're writing to inform you about an upcoming change to Amazon Lists. Starting March 25, 2026, we will remove the option to restrict purchases from third-party sellers for list items. When this change takes effect, gift purchasers will be able to purchase items sold by third-party sellers from your lists and your delivery address will be shared with the seller for fulfillment. This change will provide gift purchasers with access to a wider selection of items when shopping from your lists...Important note: When gifts are purchased from your shared or public lists, Amazon needs to provide your shipping address to sellers and delivery partners to fulfill these orders. During the delivery process, your address may become visible to gift purchasers through delivery updates and tracking information. To help protect your privacy, we recommend using a PO Box or non-residential address for any list you share with public audiences.”

How to prevent buyers from seeing your address from your Amazon Wish List

If you have an online presence and want to protect your address, you'll need to update your address in Wish List settings. Head to this link, then choose "manage list." Here, you can adjust your Wish List settings to make it private, or to choose specific users to share it with. Otherwise, you can adjust your address if you have a P.O. box or alternative address to select.

AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

Hillary Clinton slammed the House Republicans for their handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case in a blistering opening statement.

On Thursday, Clinton testified before the House Oversight Committee over her alleged ties to the deceased sex trafficker. In her opening statement, she denied any association with Epstein and claimed to have never visited his private islands or any of his other residences. She then criticized the committee for its handling of the investigation, adding:

Mr. Chairman, your investigation is supposed to be assessing the federal government’s handling of the investigations and prosecutions of Epstein and his crimes. You subpoenaed eight law enforcement officials, all of whom ran the Department of Justice or directed the FBI when Epstein’s crimes were investigated and prosecuted. Of those eight, only one appeared before the Committee. Five of the six former attorneys general were allowed to submit brief statements stating they had no information to provide.

You have held zero public hearings, refused to allow the media to attend them, including today, despite espousing the need for transparency on dozens of occasions.

You have made little effort to call the people who show up most prominently in the Epstein files. And when you did, not a single Republican Member showed up for Les Wexner’s deposition.

Clinton called the investigation an “institutional failure” that is “designed to protect one political party and one public official.” She continued:

Infuriatingly, the Trump Administration gutted the Trafficking in Persons Office at the State Department, cutting more than 70 percent of the career civil and foreign service experts who worked so hard to prevent trafficking crimes. The annual trafficking report, required by law, was delayed for months. The message from the Trump Administration to the American people and the world could not be clearer: combatting human trafficking is no longer an American priority under the Trump White House.

That is a tragedy. It’s a scandal. It deserves vigorous investigation and oversight.

A committee endeavoring to stopping human trafficking would seek to understand what specific steps are needed to fix a system that allowed Epstein to get away with his crimes in 2008.

A committee run by elected officials with a commitment to transparency would ensure the full release of all the files.

It would ensure that the lawful redactions of those files protected the victims and survivors, not powerful men and political allies.

It would get to the bottom of reports that DOJ withheld FBI interviews in which a survivor accuses President Trump of heinous crimes.

It would subpoena anyone who asked on which night there would be the “wildest party” on Epstein’s island.

It would demand testimony from prosecutors in Florida and New York about why they gave Epstein a sweetheart deal and chose not to pursue others who may have been implicated.

It would demand that Secretary Rubio and Attorney General Bondi testify about why this administration is abandoning survivors and playing into the hands of traffickers.

It would seek out officers on the front lines of this fight and ask them what support they need.

It would put forth legislation to provide more resources and force this administration to act.

Former President Bill Clinton was scheduled to testify on Friday.

The post Hillary Clinton Accuses GOP of Distracting From Trump Allegations in Explosive Opening Statement on Epstein first appeared on Mediaite.

Spotify's adding a new way to sort playlists for paying subscribers. The feature is called Smart Reorder, and it allows you to automatically sort your songs by BPM (beats per minute) and key. This is great for those who want to gradually bump up the intensity of the songs they listen to.

It's worth noting that this feature only works for playlists you've created or those you've mixed using the Spotify Mix feature, which lets you add or customize song transitions like a DJ would. Also, because Smart Reorder is an extension of Spotify Mix, you can't have one without the other. Spotify Mix hasn't yet been launched in all markets where the streaming service is present, including where I live, and as such, Smart Reorder isn't available in those regions yet. It's a shame, because I'm really excited to try it.

How to use Smart Reorder in Spotify

If you're a Spotify Premium subscriber, using the Smart Reorder feature is easy. Just open any of the playlists you've created or mixed, and tap the Edit button above the first song. Scroll to the bottom and select Smart Reorder. Spotify will automatically rearrange your songs by BPM, and you can tap the Save button up top to confirm the changes.

Smart Reorder should be a very useful feature for people like me, who prefer workout playlists that slowly bump up in intensity. I like to hear high BPM songs towards the end of my gym sessions or runs, but that might not be ideal for everyone. Some types of exercises, such as spin workouts, might be better off switching between high and low BPM songs as the intensity varies, and Smart Reorder wouldn't be great for those use cases. Some users on Reddit also suggested that you should create a copy of your playlists before using Smart Reorder on them, since you can't automatically restore playlists to their original order if you end up not liking the changes after saving them. To duplicate a Spotify playlist, open the playlist and tap the three-dots button above the list of songs. Select Add to other playlist > New playlist, then add a name for the copy and and tap Create.

This is another example of Spotify doing more with its AI DJ feature than Apple Music, where the AutoMix AI DJ feature has been more of a mixed bag for me. At the moment, AutoMix just handles song transitions, and Apple hasn't added any kind of custom playlist reordering to it.

(Screenshots)

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) grilled U.S. Surgeon General nominee Casey Means over her influencer partnership with companies she had recommended online on Wednesday, accusing the Trump administration nominee of not “telling the truth” about payments she received.

“Dr. Means, are you familiar with FTC policy that requires those who are recommending products online to disclose their financial connection to those companies?” questioned Murphy during a Senate confirmation hearing. “In particular, the document from the FTC says this: ‘If you endorse a product through social media, your endorsement message should make it obvious when you have a relationship with the brand.’ Are you familiar with that?”

After Means confirmed, “Certainly,” Murphy continued, “So, as you know, there is a pending complaint regarding your failure to adhere to those guidelines, that basically makes the contention, and this committee has verified the data that underlies their complaint, that you routinely violated this policy and that, in fact, in the majority of your posts for many of the products you recommend, you did not transparently reveal your financial connection.”

“That’s false,” protested Means.

“Well, I’ll give you an example,” shot back Murphy. “So, there’s a prenatal vitamin called WeNatal. Your filings before this committee show that you started receiving compensation in the Spring of 2024, and yet in September of 2024, you posted a video saying that you had no financial relationship to the company, just a big fan, and then in October you said, ‘Not sponsored, just love these.’ But in fact, you have documentation before this committee that showed when you said those things you had a financial relationship. You had already started receiving money from that company.”

Means insisted, “In any post where I said I am not receiving money, I had not been receiving money at that time.”

“But you had received partnership fees for this particular prenatal vitamin,” replied Murphy. “In fact, prior to September and October, you had posted partnership links in which you get compensated based on click-throughs, correct?”

Means denied the accusation, responding, “I am happy to whatever documentation you’re talking about, but I do not– it’s incorrect and it’s a false representation. And just to be very clear, I’ve spent the last several months working with the Office of Government Ethics to be fully compliant with this process. I take it very seriously.”

“Before, during, and after, if I am in office, I will be in full compliance with the Office of Government Ethics,” she concluded. “I think, as I’ve talked about, conflicts of interest are incredibly important to rectify if we’re in public service and I am fully committed to continuing to work with that.”

Watch above.

The post ‘You Weren’t Telling the Truth’: Senator Grills Trump Administration Nominee Over Payments She Received For Endorsing Products first appeared on Mediaite.